Assessments as Learning Tools

EGEE 401: Energy in a Changing World incorporates infographics as part of the assessment strategy to help students evaluate, analyze, and synthesize assigned readings. Traditionally, the course relied on weekly quizzes, which included both auto-graded and essay questions. While the automated questions alleviated some of the grading workload for the faculty, they didn’t provide an optimal representation of student comprehension. The essays provided the instructor with a stronger valuation of student learning but were time-consuming to grade.

The assessment strategy was redesigned in order to enhance students learning and retention of the material while providing a better balance to the instructor’s grading workload. Infographics encourage the students to review the course material and thoroughly evaluate the concepts presented. Students must then identify one external source, such as a journal article, and synthesize the information in the article with the course content. Students then use a graphic design program such as Adobe Express or Canva to create an infographic to be submitted for grading.

A rubric is used to communicate expectations for student success and consistency of grading across the submissions. Since infographics are a creative activity, grading could easily become subjective. The use of a rubric provides a predetermined set of criteria by which the instructor will evaluate students’ performance on the assignment: accuracy of information, clarity of communications, thoughtful reflection of the content, authenticity of content (prevents students from simply copying and pasting content from the course pages), visual design of the infographic, and proper citations of external sources.  

The 3-2-1 method is a student-centered formative assessment activity that can be used to gauge student understanding of course material and determine where students might need additional support. Students are asked to consider a lesson, video, lab, etc., and respond by describing three things they learned, two things they found especially interesting, and one question they still have. This method provides students with structure to reflect on their own learning and it encourages critical thinking. Student responses help instructors determine what material may need to be reviewed and where students are feeling engaged. The results can be valuable for instructors to consider when modifying their lesson material for future classes. This strategy can also be used at the start of class to reflect on what was learned in a previous lesson or at the end of a class to consider what was learned that day.

Image

Photo Credit

Credit: © Olga Rai / stock.adobe.com

Assignment wrappers are communication tools that facilitate partnering with students to analyze their work and their learning. The use of assignment wrappers can help students improve on future assignments and let students know that you are available to help them succeed.

The following example shows a wrapper for a writing assignment and includes four essential elements: rationale, reflection, comparison, and adjustment. A rationale gives the reasoning behind the use of the wrapper, the reflection section helps students engage with the way they tackled the work for the assignment, the comparison section guides students as they consider what they've done well and what areas need improvement, and the adjustment portion helps them consider tweaking their studying and learning process and signals your willingness to help.

Rationale

This activity will help you evaluate your preparation and performance for this assignment and help you adjust your future practices. The goal is to help you improve the quality of your writing. Your responses will have no effect on your grade and are solely to help you improve. Being totally honest with yourself is an essential part of self-examination.

Reflection: How did you tackle this assignment?

This includes consideration of time management and the percentage of time you spent on the following:

• ____ PREPARING: reading and note-taking on the class materials and researching/finding supporting articles and taking notes on them.
• ____ THINKING: putting the assignment into your own words, consulting the grading rubric, thinking, brainstorming, conceptualizing, and sharing ideas with others (Thinking includes understanding the issue(s), thinking about supporting your position, and figuring out how to connect to your audience).
• ____ WRITING: writing an admittedly bad first draft and letting it sit around for at least a day.
• ____ EDITING: revisiting the first draft and editing it for clarity /making sure support is in place for your arguments/getting your citations right/working with our writing tutor.
• ____ FINALIZING: preparing for submission: final read-through, tweaking - formatting, proofreading, etc..

Comparison

Now that you've looked over my feedback and the rubric and have considered the way you tackled the assignment, consider this question: What kinds of mistakes did you make?

Adjustment

What will you do differently next time? Naming three specific things is a good goal. Do you have the information necessary to meet the goals you've set? What else do you need? What can I do to help you?

Students first take the exam independently, and then, during the same class period and before seeing their results, they get into groups of 4 to 5, discuss the exam problems, and retake the same exam as a group. Each student chooses whether or not to complete and submit a second exam. Students have the option of simply accepting their original, independent exam score only, if they wish. For students choosing to submit a second time, the exam attempts are weighted so that the first attempt is worth 70% of the total and the second attempt is worth 30% of the total.

This activity provides some agency on the part of students and fosters collaboration as well as cohesion of the classroom community. The activity also helps students look to each other for answers instead of relying solely on the instructor and may replace classroom time during which instructors must review misunderstood concepts for the benefit of just a few students. This method has been shown to increase median exam scores. 
 

In GEOG 438W: Human Dimensions of Global Warming, rubrics are used not only to evaluate student work but are employed as a tool for fostering a feedback cycle focused on reflection and inquiry. In addition to a draft of their paper, students are asked to submit a marked copy of the assignment rubric, which is casual in tone and student-centered, to show how they think they’ve done with their writing. The instructor then marks the rubric as well, and a conversation follows, as the completed rubric provides a good picture of the differences between student and instructor evaluations. According to Wherley & Robinson (2020), This activity offers “…the potential to increase feelings of student agency and motivation, and enhances the quality of learning in this course. Furthermore, students’ practice with these self-reflective and metacognitive skills will serve them in future work in and outside of the classroom.” Rubrics for GEOG 438W were made in Microsoft Word.

The following rubric was used by a student to self-assess his/her work on Essay 1 and was turned in along with Essay 1. Instructor use of the rubric was done during grading, and instructor comments, below the rubric, were provided at that time as well.

Student: Please highlight the statement in each row which best describes your assessment of your work. The instructor will color the box in each row which best describes the instructor’s assessment of your work.

Hi [Student],

Please consider the comments provided here in conjunction with the rubric above and my edited markup of your Essay 1 submission.

I'd like to highlight some things you've done really well (glow!) and some things to work on for next time (grow!).

Glow: You have done very well organizing your thoughts and thoroughly answering the question, and with some minor tweaking of your intro and conclusion, you'll be in excellent shape in this department (see my edited markup of your essay). Overall, the writing itself is clear, and I can see that you've edited for grammatical and other issues – good work!

Grow: Please spend some time reviewing the formatting requirements for assignments in this course – losing points in this area is preventable. The biggest issue by far to work on is that this response doesn't use any supporting evidence to justify the claims you're making about economic growth, population growth, and personal vehicle use patterns in the US and Italy. Many of your statements were super general, and I can’t see that they were researched much at all. There are no numbers to support economic indicators of vehicle ownership, and neither of these countries is growing rapidly enough population-wise to support the connection you're trying to make there. I'm concerned about this aspect in particular because it's really important to substantiate your position with evidence to make it compelling, and I see on our rubric here that this is something you felt like you had done really well with for this essay. Please review our writing workshop page on supporting statements with evidence and let me know if you have additional questions.

Instructor

Image

Photo Credit

Credit: © Olga Rai / stock.adobe.com

Use a simple form with low-stakes assessments to help students analyze their results and think about how to improve their study plans. The kind of form pictured below (based on one developed by C. Book at Lubbock Christian University and best used with assessment questions that align with lesson objectives) can be used along with a short assessment and then again after the correct answers have been revealed. First, students mark the form as they are taking the assessment to show whether they are confident or unsure of each of their answers. Later, when answers have been revealed, students can consider their choices for each question, discover how they’ve done, and mark the form to indicate whether each mistake was simple or indicative of a larger problem. Following up with students to review appropriate study strategies and to offer clarification and assistance is essential.

1. As you work on the assessment activity, mark each question as "confident" or "unsure" depending on how you felt about your answer.
2. After the answers have been revealed, indicate which questions you got right and wrong.
3. For answers you got wrong, consider if you made a simple mistake or if you really don't get it.
4. Determine your strengths, highest priorities for studying and review, and where you need help.
5. Document how you prepared for this exam.
6. Set some learning goals and determine what study strategies might help you meet those goals. Ask for help!

The one-minute paper is an assessment strategy that can be used to evaluate what students have learned and what they are struggling with. Students are asked two to three questions about a lecture, video, lab, field trip, discussion, or any other activity, and are given one minute to write their response. The questions should encourage students to consider what was most significant, surprising, important, disturbing, or useful, and what was unclear or difficult to understand. This can be done at the start of class to reflect on what was learned in the previous class or at the end of class to consider what was learned that day.

The instructor should read the minute papers to evaluate student progress and identify any gaps in learning and understanding. Information gathered can be used to identify areas that need clarification or review. This activity will also highlight areas the instructor should consider covering more thoroughly in future class periods.

This activity can be done with pencil and paper, or it can be done using technology such as discussion boards, surveys, or low-stakes quizzes in your LMS, etc. One-minute papers can be used in online and face-to-face classes.